Does home exercises make you stronger?

About the AuthorPeter Walsh is an organizational advisor and the author of How to Organize (Just About) Everything. His media exposure includes appearances on The Early Show and Fox News, as well as in such publications as USA Today, The New York Times, and Real Simple. He divides his time among Los Angeles and Melbourne, Australia. For more data with regards to Peter visit www.peterwalshdesign.com.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

Introduction

The Extra Weight

A culture of fat

The easiest thing to be in America is fat. It’s more comfortable than working, posing no difficulty than raising a family, more comfortable than making money, and unquestionably having little impact than getting up and switching off the TV. Being fat has become the national pastime.

When it comes to body size and image, we live in a confused and contradictory world. For all the concern the social commentators, the psychologists, and the politically rectify have in regards to the insalubrious influence of those slick fashion and celebrity magazines featuring too-thin models and quickly reducing stars, that’s not where the real problem lies. Yes, the culture of thin that appears in magazines, in movies, and on television is ubiquitous, marketing everything from cars to new dentures. But thin’s not the story on the street.

The reality is that we worship large. Our cars are the biggest and the fattest — we drive vehicles that consume a gallon of gas each ten miles. Our houses are big — the intermediate home size is regularly increasing while the intermediate family size is decreasing. Our homes are overflowing with the fat of the things we consume — we spend more time buying goods than any other persons on earth. Our meals are gargantuan — share sizes have tripled in the United States over the last twenty-five years. Boeing has increased the assumed weight for each passenger by more than twenty pounds. Office chairs are being made larger to accommodate our more spectacular butts. Even Disneyland, the happiest — but evidently not the thinnest — place on earth, is redesigning a good deal of of it is costumes and uniforms to accommodate ever-increasing waist sizes. You’ll be happy to recognise that even if you have a fifty-eight-inch waist and want to work at Disneyland, they have a pair of pants for you! Everywhere we see the effects of an growingly heavy population — from office chairs to bra sizes, everything is getting bigger. And, most noticeable of all, our pants no longer fit most of us — no surprise since the intermediate waist size has grown four inches in less than ten years. With two-thirds of Americans overweight or obese, it’s out of the question to deny that we love, love, love fat.

As a nation we are reveling in an orgy of consumption and it shows no sign of letting up. We can’t get sufficient of anything. The American mantra has become “more is better” and we are applying that motto with gusto to closely each aspect of our lives. If consuming is good, then consuming more is better.

When did buying stuff become a national obsession? When did we become such crazy consumers? When did we get so fat? It all seems to have happened speedily and with little warning. Yesterday you had no disturb fitting into your jeans and today you feel like you’re being strangled — at the waistline. America and the world have changed dramatically in our own lifetime. Everything moves more quickly — fast travel, fast mail, fast food. We are all drawn into this ever-quickening pace. “I want it and I want it now” seems closely reasonable. If others may have it, why can’t I?

Amazingly, we have come close to achieving instant gratification. The 1.3 billion credit cards in circulation in America are one indication that we may buy things the moment the urge strikes us, whether we may afford them or not. We may compensate for it later. And a great deal of stuff is cheap anyway. We buy things with little thought of the aftermaths and, even when buried in debt, our purchases continue. We may afford a lot and get it fast. So what do we do? We fill our houses and our lives with it.

Similarly, feed is cheap and without delay available. We now buy half the feed we consume outside our homes. Takeout is quick, efficient, and cheap. It suits our fast-paced lives. You don’t have to think with regards to what you’re eating — or how much. You’ll deal with it later. Or not. We seem to be veritably incognizant of the connection amongst what we put into our mouths and the size of our waists. We may even ignore reality by purchasing one of the new digital cameras with a “slim down” function. Hewlett-Packard’s internet site promises “the slimming feature, available on select HP digital camera models, is a subtle effect that may instantaneously trim off pounds from the subjects in your photos!” Now you may go down in skinny history. But in the here and now, this comfortableness comes at a cost. Pig out today, but strip down to your underwear tomorrow, stand in front of a mirror, and you’ll see the cost I’m talking about!

When it comes to losing weight, we are promised the same instant weight loss that those digital cameras offer. A house may be built on television in a week. An ugly duckling may get a new face and a new body in a mere sixty minutes on prime time. A celebrity may lose the baby weight in three weeks. Who may blame us for expecting the instant fix? But it’s all an illusion. Paying with a credit card seems painless, but we all recognise the bill comes later and has to be remunerated off with hours of hard work.

The same is true when you overeat on a regular basis. Only hard work will get rid of the excess. Our selections today have aftermaths we have to deal with tomorrow — there’s no way around it.

It’s All Too Much:
Living a Richer Life with Less Stuff

Four years ago I became the organizational expert on a television show called Clean Sweep. The premise of the show was very simple. A team of experts — including me, a designer, a carpenter, and a crew that assisted in the painting and redesign plans — was given two days to help a family dig out from under their overpowering clutter.

In two days, with a budget of two thousand dollars, we tackled two rooms and genuinely managed to work a heap of miracles. These were not homes with a little clutter here and there. I vividly do not forget walking into a home where the homeowner said, without flinching, while standing in three-foot-deep clutter, “There is a piano in there somewhere, but I haven’t seen it in seventeen years.” We found a dining room where the family had not seen the surface of the dining table — much less managed to eat there — for more than six years. And then there was the guy with more than three hundred pairs of shoes — and that wasn’t counting what he’d concealed in the garage before I got there! This was clutter that had a life of it is own, taking over whole homes and suffocating any chance that the family might have had to live an organized, stress-free life.

The humans on Clean Sweep may be uttermost cases, but this circumstance is far more mutual than any of the Clean Sweep team had expected. It was not strange for our production office to receive two hundred and fifty apps a day, all begging to be on the show. Like the clutter we saw each day, we were inundated with persons requiring our help. The sheer weight and volume of what people own is veritably overpowering a good deal of homes throughout America. It’s hard to find a home today that has a garage in which there’s room left to park a car. There are the houses so full of “stuff” that families are scaled down to navigating narrow paths through their clutter. We saw spaces so full of collectibles, furniture, paper, clothes, books, and shoes that even the householders themselves seemed mystified by what their lives had become.

What started out as a program to aid persons deal with clutter speedily morphed into something very different. It became evident that the clutter represented something much deeper going on in some of the people’s lives and relationships. For those people, and a heap of of the clients I work with, a shift had taken place — closely without them realizing it. They no longer owned their stuff; their stuff owned them. For some, it went even further. Their “stuff” was the way they specified themselves — “I am what I own.” They were unable or unwilling to discerned themselves from what they owned to the point that their living spaces became partially — or in a good deal of cases exclusively — unusable. To break this pattern is an intense challenge. It’s not just with regards to putting things in rubbish bags or finding the right photo boxes. I support people confront and redefine their relationships with what they own.

The letters that appear all around this book are a sampling of the a good deal of e-mails and notes I receive almost each day. I’ve got rid of names and/or stripped away identifying details, but the sentiments are authenti and the people who have conveyed them are real.

Dear Peter:
I believe that if I may learn to “let go,” change will
happen. All of this clutter is taking my life away from
me. There is so much going on, in a literal sense and figuratively,
in my house that there is no room for happiness. I find
that my body is overwhelmed, my house is overwhelmed,
and my mind is overwhelmed. This is a selfimposed
prison that I can’t get out of. The “clutter”
rules each corner of my life.

Each of us has one life. You. Me. Our friends and family. But I have to ask: Is it the life you want? It may be unexpected, but this is the question I always get started with when helping humans declutter and coordinate their homes — and at long last their lives. What is the resourcefulness you have of the life you want to live? Are you living the life you want?

This is where galore of my clients have lost their way. Somehow they’ve lost sight of what it is they want from the life they have. Almost imperceptibly their stuff infiltrates. Eventually the clutter fills their space and their life. A sense of feeling of annoyance at being hindered or criticized and impotence takes over and they feel powerless to turn things around.

Creating a resourcefulness for the life you want to live forces you to make conclusions based on the real priorities that will have to drive your life. Do you want to keep the last three years of magazine subscriptions, or do you want to use that dining table for dinner with your family? Do you want to fill the garage with boxes containing your grandmother’s moth-eaten tablecloths, or do you want to preserve your investment in your car? Do you want your children’s laundry piled on your bed, or do you want your bedroom to be a place of peace and intimacy? Your home s…

Does Home Exercises Make You Stronger

Diets don’t work. Why not? Because they focus on what foods we ought to and shouldn’t eat but totally ignore everything else that makes us fat. Look at your own situation: You say you want to lose weight, but you just can’t stop indulging. You say you’d exercise more if only you had the time, yet you spend precious hours each night in front of the TV doing what? Munching nutrition-free snacks and drinking supersized beverages.

Peter Walsh, the bestselling author of It’s All Too Much: An Easy Plan for Living a Richer Life with Less Stuff, believes that the mystery to with great success losing weight is to forget when it comes to calorie counting and on a weekly basis weigh-ins. Instead you need to focus on how, why, and where you eat. When it comes to clearing clutter (the fat in our homes) it isn’t in regards to the stuff itself, it’s with regards to the life you want to live. The same is true for losing weight: It’s not in regards to the pounds, it’s in regards to living the life you is worthy of in the body you want.

Using his expert proficiencies honed from years as a clutter expert and organizational consultant on TLC’s Clean Sweep, Peter helps you address how the clutter in your kitchen, your pantry, and your home is directly affiliated to the clutter on your body and negatively affects your capacity to lead a full and healthful life. This book shows you how to clean up not just the spaces where you eat, but the routines around them: from planning meals and buying goods to dinnertime rituals.

Peter knows all the pitfalls and all the excuses. In Does This Clutter Make My Butt Look Fat? he gives you the tools (and courage) you need to get over all your excuses, face the issues, and make the alter to a better life.

This is not a diet book. This is a book with regards to your life — when it comes to creating the healthful life and body you have always imagined for yourself. Peter helps you kick the food-clutter habit forever. You have only one life. Start living it today.

Most helpful client reviews

80 of 84 people found the following review helpful.
Disappointed
By Jay Dreyer
I was actually disappointed with this book, having enjoyed his last one. In fact, there are multiple instances in this book where he proposes reading “It’s All Too Much”. I’d take his counsel one step further and say read that book and skip this one, as this is in truth only applying the principles from that book to the kitchen.

There’s not one thing groundbreaking here – basically, clean up your kitchen so you’ll use it. Stop eating out, reduce part sizes, plan in front when it comes to what you’ll eat for the week and think in regards to what you’re putting into your body. That’s it. Common sense stuff every one knows but finds difficult to put into practice.

I’ll say it again, if you haven’t read “It’s All Too Much”, do yourself a favor and get it now. That book was life altering in how it forces you to think with regards to your stuff and your kinship with it. This book doesn’t come close to that, at least for me.

82 of 87 persons found the following review helpful.
Worth your time to read
By Teacher Jeanne
I have read the primary three chapters of this book and find it to be easy to read and understand and full of worthful information. If you’re like me and you’re just discovering that your living space is a reflectiveness of your own body then you will find this book enlightening. I come from a family of fat cluttered people. Since starting to read this book, and observing Peter on Oprah, I have started to declutter both my house and my body. It is not a diet book with recipes and calorie counting. This is a book regarding how to modify your kinship with feed and clutter. I look forward to continuing this book and continuing my less cluttered life.

**********************************************************************
Update: I am still reading this but stopped to pick up his basi book in the middle. He gets to the point where he says he is not going to rehash his whole introductory book. He only spends 10 pages on your whole house before focusing in on the kitchen. So this book is now paused while I check out the firstborn book that is supposed be more of a step by step to declutter your whole house. I don’t think you HAVE to read his introductory one, but I want to do this all the way so I am going to myself. I still think this books is worth the time and investment.

97 of 106 humans found the following review helpful.
Thank You,, Peter!!
By N. Rice
Peter Walsh proceeds to lead us in the journeying of a less cluttered life. This is not a diet book, it’s a life altering book. In his own no-nonsense style, Peter shows us that an over-stuffed life may lead to an over-stuffed body. Peter reminds us that we are a society of too much. He attempts to remind us a clean, coordinated modus vivendi will support us to find the path that will take us to a healthful body and spirit. No recipes, no meal plans, no caloric values most of us recognise the fundamental principle already. This book is with regards to altering the way you operate in your life from your home living circumstance to what you put in your mouth. It makes you think using a organized mind rather of a rushed disorganized mind. If you enjoyed his book “IT’S ALL TOO MUCH” and you need to lose some excess body clutter, read this book. It just might modify your life

See all 34 client reviews…

Does Home Exercises Make You Stronger Pic

Does Home Exercises Make You Stronger Image

Does Home Exercises Make You Stronger Image

Does Home Exercises Make You Stronger Photo

In this article, I’m going to explore the theory/notion that those humans with the iPod at the gym have a better vantage when working out. Using assorted sources, including online science articles, online study reports, and magazines, I’m going to explore the myth more in-depth. Why this subject matter? Simply because it’s interesting. Any new study that boasts when it comes to performance gains from simple habit changes or additions to routine is something that anybody may take something away from.

My personal experience while listening to my MP3 player while working out can’t actually prove or disprove this theory, merely because I’m not in the mindset–neither are most persons when they workout or exercise. Personally, I listen to music while exercising to distract me from the happenings around me. It keeps me concentered on the task at hand because, for example, I don’t get caught up in speech with another gym-goer in the middle of my work-out. I move from one set to the next with little rests in between. No beguilements equals more work-out time, which I believe in turn translates to larger strength development and fitness gain. Another little contributing factor, I think, is that music (especially your favored music) puts you in the zone. When you’re listening to a song that motivates you, you’re more likely to excel. This is just my personal reasoning, but let’s explore more in-depth into the subject.

In the May 2007 issue of “Muscle and Fitness” magazine, Dr. Jim Stoppani put this theory to test when a subscriber asked the following:

“I not so long ago purchased an iPod to use at the gym. I swear that since I’ve been listening to my favored songs while I train, my workouts are much better. My strength has shot up dramatically and I’ve gained noticeable muscle size. Can music in truth affect training, or am I just crazy?”

So, how else would you answer such an intriguing question? You put it to the test and tackle it head on. To explore the notion of muscle strength and overall aerobic increase, Muscle and Fitness assembled a group of in a professional manner trained bodybuilders finish a simple shoulder workout on two discerned days. For apparent reasons, this wasn’t tested in one day because fatigue and lactic acid buildup would unquestionably skew the results. The procedure was a simple 3 set overhead press with free-weights and three sets of free-weight lateral raises. These sets were done to each bodybuilder’s 10 rep max (10RM) until each set is taken to failure. I, personally, don’t like the use of the word “failure” in this context because the definition of the word and the context in this sense translate it to mean utter under-performance, which isn’t the case. I’d rather the phrase “until fatigued” be used in place of ‘failure’. During one workout, the subjects did the routines while listening to their choice of music on headphones. During the other, they did not listen to music.

So, what were the results? You might be amazed to find out. On each set of each exercise for the duration of the shoulder workouts, the test subjects had an intermediate of at least one extra rep. Other times, two extra reps. All of the betterment was while listening to music. What precisely does this entail? Why did subjects carry out better while listening to music? Was it just a psychological element or is there a great deal of scientific reason or physiological betterment within the body?

The motivational elements are obvious. The magazine article points out music for the duration of dramatic scenes in movies. Do you think the “Rocky” training scene would have been as awe inspiring as it was without the Bill Conte theme? Of course not.

In the December 2006 issue of “The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness”, a similar test was performed. In this case, it was performed on test subjects doing aerobics – running and walking. The study showed that music genuinely helped increase speed while running and decreased fatigue. As stated in former paragraphs, the same may now be determined while doing strength and weight resistance exercises.

Music helps motivate. Period. Why do you think aerobic trainers use fast-paced music for the duration of aerobic and exercise classes? Because it pumps you up. It motivates you, it gives you a sense of rhythm within yourself. As an added bonus, you may even consider that you’re just dancing intensely as opposed to working out strenuously. Instructors use music as an ergogenic aid and have been since the introduction of aerobic dance in the early 1970′s.

What effect does music have on your heart rate and respiration? This has been of peculiar interest to researchers for years due to the importance of physical fitness and impairment of normal physiological function prevention. The cardiac responses while doing aerobics to music are outstanding. Why are scientists so intrigued regarding music and working out? Simply put, the value of controlling respiratory action is of queer interest because it may help in treatment of dissimilar heart and artery conditions.

Several decades ago, 1952 to be exact, Dr. Ellis and Dr. Brighouse tested the theory of music being added to an aerobic routine. Studies concluded that the intermediate heart rate increased from 72-80 beats per minute to 70 to 170 beats per minute. The two concluded that music in all likelihood does fabricate a physiological, or emotional, effect thence increasing heart rate.

Is the heart rate and respiratory increase only with upbeat, fast paced music? Or would any style of music suffice? In 1977, a scientist named Dainow concluded that any type of music, whether it be slow, moderate, or fast tempo, genuinely increments the heart rate a sure degree. This is widely affected by the subject’s personal preference and passion of music. Personal preference does need to be taken into consideration. If, for example, the most amazing and welleducated personal trainer in the entire world, Melissa Schmidt designed an aerobic workout for her class while playing classic rock in the background, not all students would have the same effect on heart rate. Although studies have concluded that any type of music while working out has a good deal of degree of cardiac increase, I personally believe that this has to be taken with a subject by subject account. I.E., one of my friends doesn’t like music. Hard to believe, I know. He cannot listen to music at all. It’s not that he enjoys sure genres more than others, he just looks at music with disdain whether it be jazz or rock. If a boombox happened to be playing in the gym while he worked out, odds are that it might hinder his performance. Could I hit the bench press just as hard with Celine Dion’s “My Heart Will Go On” blaring in the background as much as I could with numerous hard-rock or heavy metal? Definitely not. If a subject, even though it rare, disapprovals music in general, then any type of coordinated sound would alter his performance level for the worse. But sufficient with regards to the very miniscule population of persons that dislike music. Any time I reference music-haters from this point on, I’ll use the term “complete frickin’ idiots”.

Now that you recognise that it’s been determined that music may modify your workout for the greater, how regarding the tempo of music? Can you see a more outstanding result with a much heavier tempo song? More specifically, how regarding strength gain? Well, I could only find one study on strength gains with dissimilar types of music. In 1981, Dr. Pearce conducted exploration on subjects while listening to stimulative music, sedative music, and no music. The results were in truth rather surprising. Sedative(Slow tempo) music genuinely decreased strength significantly equated to upbeat music and silence. The surprising element here is that slow music genuinely formulated less results than finish silence. Also surprising was that stimulative music and silence showed perfectly no divergence in strength gains or loss.

What does this mean? Well, it would appear that mild or slow music may genuinely hinder your performance and training capacity rather drastically. This exploration has to be taken into contemplation that there are no other published studies on music type and performance. What may a personal trainer take from just this study alone? Be very wise with your choice of workout environs with a client. For your client’s benefit, your best selections would be no music or high-tempo music.

70 college students enrolled in an aerobic dance class (35 male and 35 female) were surveyed on music parts and how they felt or sensed each factor bettered their performance. 97% of the students conveyed that they felt the music affected their aerobic performance. The following elements and percentages indicate how much each one affected the student’s sensed influence: music style (97%), rhythm or beat (94%), tempo (96%), lyrics (77%), volume (66%), mood (37%) and melody (17%). The correlation amidst the responses of males and females indicated that gender isn’t a great factor.

In conclusion, if you don’t already plug those ear-buds into your ear before you hit the weights or go for that run, you will have to consider it. Research has proven that beneficial strength and performance gains are more than possible when your workout is accompanied by music. Load up that iPod with your bestloved songs and hit the gym. You just might be amazed by the results you see when working out to music. Be sure to listen to music you actually like. Whether it be 50 Cent, Fallout Boy, or Queen – light those ear drums up with a good deal of happiness.